Re: Key management with tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Key management with tests
Date
Msg-id 20210115214719.GE8740@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Key management with tests  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Key management with tests  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: Key management with tests  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 04:23:22PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:49 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > I am planning to apply this next week.
> 
> I don't think that's appropriate. Several prominent community members
> have told you that the patch, as committed the first time, needed a
> lot more work. There hasn't been enough time between then and now for
> you, or anyone, to do that amount of work. This patch needs detailed
> and substantial review from senior community members, and multiple
> rounds of feedback and improvement, before it should be considered for
> commit.
> 
> I am not even sure there is a consensus on the design, without which
> any commit is always premature.

If people want changes, I need to hear about it here.  I have address
everything people have mentioned in these threads so far.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: patch: reduce overhead of execution of CALL statement in no atomic mode from PL/pgSQL
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Change default of checkpoint_completion_target