Re: jit and explain nontext - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Justin Pryzby
Subject Re: jit and explain nontext
Date
Msg-id 20210115202546.GA8560@telsasoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: jit and explain nontext  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 02:53:49PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> On balance I agree with Peter's opinion that this isn't worth
> changing.  I would be for the patch if the executor had a little
> more freedom of action, but as things stand there's not much
> freedom there.

Thanks for looking
CF: withdrawn.

-- 
Justin



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve pg_dump dumping publication tables
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Key management with tests