Re: Proposal: Global Index - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Proposal: Global Index
Date
Msg-id 20210107141620.GG32172@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal: Global Index  (曾文旌 <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com>)
Responses Re: Proposal: Global Index  (曾文旌 <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan  7, 2021 at 05:44:01PM +0800, 曾文旌 wrote:
> I've been following this topic for a long time. It's been a year since the last response.
> It was clear that our customers wanted this feature as well, and a large number of them mentioned it.
> 
> So, I wish the whole feature to mature as soon as possible.
> I summarized the scheme mentioned in the email and completed the POC patch(base on PG_13).

I think you need to address the items mentioned in this blog, and the
email link it mentions:

    https://momjian.us/main/blogs/pgblog/2020.html#July_1_2020

I am not clear this is a feature we will want.  Yes, people ask for it,
but if the experience will be bad for them and they will regret using
it, I am not sure we want it.  Of course, if you code it up and we get
a good user experience, we would want it --- I am just saying it is not
clear right now.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Removing unneeded self joins
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Error on failed COMMIT