Re: Proposed patch for key managment - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Proposed patch for key managment
Date
Msg-id 20201222213409.GB9170@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposed patch for key managment  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 04:13:06PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 08:15:27PM +0000, Alastair Turner wrote:
> > Hi Bruce
> > 
> > In ckey_passphrase.sh.sample
> > 
> > +
> > +echo "$PASS" | sha256sum | cut -d' ' -f1
> > +
> > 
> > Under the threat model discussed, a copy of the keyfile could be
> > attacked offline. So getting from passphrase to DEKs should be as
> > resource intensive as possible to slow down brute-force attempts.
> > Instead of just a SHA hash, this should be at least a PBKDF2 (PKCS#5)
> 
> I am satisfied with the security of SHA256.

Sorry, I should have said I am happy with a SHA512 HMAC in a 256-bit
keyspace.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposed patch for key managment
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Preventing hangups in bgworker start/stop during DB shutdown