Greetings,
* Alvaro Herrera (alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org) wrote:
> On 2020-Dec-10, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Laurenz Albe (laurenz.albe@cybertec.at) wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 17:29 +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
> > > > +1 to setting checkpoint_completion_target to 0.9 by default.
> > >
> > > +1 for changing the default or getting rid of it, as Tom suggested.
> >
> > Attached is a patch to change it from a GUC to a compile-time #define
> > which is set to 0.9, with accompanying documentation updates.
>
> I think we should leave a doc stub or at least an <indexterm>, to let
> people know the GUC has been removed rather than just making it
> completely invisible. (Maybe piggyback on the stuff in [1]?)
>
> [1] https://postgr.es/m/CAGRY4nyA=jmBNa4LVwgGO1GyO-RnFmfkesddpT_uO+3=mot8DA@mail.gmail.com
Yes, I agree, and am involved in that thread as well- currently waiting
feedback from others about the proposed approach.
Getting a few more people looking at that thread and commenting on it
would really help us be able to move forward.
Thanks,
Stephen
