Hi,
On 2020-12-07 17:25:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fair enough. It wasn't entirely clear to me whether it'd be kosher to
> write
> EEO_CASE(EEOP_SBSREF_OLD)
> EEO_CASE(EEOP_SBSREF_ASSIGN)
> EEO_CASE(EEOP_SBSREF_FETCH)
> {
> // do something
> EEO_NEXT();
> }
>
> I can see that that should work for the two existing implementations
> of EEO_CASE, but I wasn't sure if you wanted to wire in an assumption
> that it'll always work.
I don't think it's likely to be a problem, and if it ends up being one,
we can still deduplicate the ops at that point...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
