On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:53:59PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 11:40:22AM +0300, Sergei Kornilov wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > > To get an increase in the number of records that means that the same
> > > statement
> > > would appear at top level AND nested level. This seems a corner case with
> > > very low
> > > (neglectible) occurence rate.
> >
> > +1
> > I think splitting fields into plans_toplevel / plans_nested will be less convenient. And more code with higher
chanceof copypaste errors
>
> As I mentioned in a previous message, I really have no idea if that would be a
> corner case or not. For instance with native partitioning, the odds to have
> many different query executed both at top level and as a nested statement may
> be quite higher.
The consensus seems to be adding a new boolean toplevel flag in the entry key,
so PFA a patch implementing that. Note that the key now has padding, so
memset() calls are required.
