Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes
Date
Msg-id 20201201033103.cebj56i3s57zytuy@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes  (Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2020-11-30 13:35:46 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> I find that when I most often want a backtrace of a running, live
> backend, it's because the backend is doing something that isn't
> passing a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() so it's not responding to signals. So
> it wouldn't help if a backend is waiting on an LWLock, busy in a
> blocking call to some loaded library, a blocking syscall, etc. But
> there are enough other times I want live backtraces, and I'm not the
> only one whose needs matter.

Random thought: Wonder if it could be worth adding a conditionally
compiled mode where we track what the longest time between two
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() calls is (with some extra logic for client
IO).

Obviously the regression tests don't tend to hit the worst cases of
CFR() less code, but even if they did, we currently wouldn't know from
running the regression tests.


Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes