Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: pg_proc.dat "proargmodes is not a 1-D char array" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: pg_proc.dat "proargmodes is not a 1-D char array"
Date
Msg-id 20201123150630.GA10860@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_proc.dat "proargmodes is not a 1-D char array"  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_proc.dat "proargmodes is not a 1-D char array"  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 2020-Nov-17, Tom Lane wrote:

> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:32 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> Adding the expected length to the error message might be OK though.
> 
> > Certainly seems like we should do at least that much. The current
> > message is just wrong, right?
> 
> It's incomplete, for sure.  Doesn't mention nulls either.

So let's go with this one.
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: [bug+patch] Inserting DEFAULT into generated columns from VALUES RTE
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_proc.dat "proargmodes is not a 1-D char array"