Re: BUG #16486: Prompted password is ignored when password specified in connection string - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: BUG #16486: Prompted password is ignored when password specified in connection string
Date
Msg-id 20201111001854.GD12947@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #16486: Prompted password is ignored when password specified in connection string  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Mon, Nov  2, 2020 at 12:33:33AM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 10:19:58PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep  3, 2020 at 03:05:38PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep  2, 2020 at 03:47:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > > > > I used a later version of Tom's patch to add documentation of how
> > > > > connection strings can override command-line options, plus it has the
> > > > > password description improvements.
> > > > 
> > > > >          <option>--all</option>) is not used, the database name is read
> > > > >          from the environment variable <envar>PGDATABASE</envar>.  If
> > > > >          that is not set, the user name specified for the connection is
> > > > > -        used.
> > > > > +        used.  <link linkend="libpq-connstring">Connction strings</link>
> > > > > +        can also be used for connection specifications, and these can
> > > > > +        override other command-line options.
> > > > >         </para>
> > > > >        </listitem>
> > > > >       </varlistentry>
> > > > 
> > > > * Spellcheck (not "Connction" please)
> ...
> > > Sure, makes sense.  Updated patch attached.
> > 
> > Patch applied to all supported versions;  thanks for the report.
> 
> Unfortunately that included the typo Tom pointed out :(

Oops, I missed that.  Fixed, thanks.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee




pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Kurt Roeckx
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #16707: Memory leak
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #16707: Memory leak