Re: New "function tables" in V13 documentation - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: New "function tables" in V13 documentation
Date
Msg-id 20201109200642.GA30521@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New "function tables" in V13 documentation  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Responses Re: New "function tables" in V13 documentation  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Re: New "function tables" in V13 documentation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On 2020-Nov-08, Adrian Klaver wrote:

> On 11/8/20 1:57 PM, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> > In case someone is interested: there is a little discussion going on on
> > Reddit whether the new format of presenting functions in V13 is a step
> > backwards:
> > 
> >     https://www.reddit.com/r/PostgreSQL/comments/jpi0rp/does_anyone_else_feel_like_the_v13_docs_are_a/
> 
> Yeah, I would agree with the mobile first design comments. Then again that
> plague is hitting most sites these days. My 2 cents is it is a step
> backwards. You can cover more ground quickly and digest it faster in the old
> format.

The person who made that comment retracted later.

If you have suggestion on how to improve the new format, I'm sure we can
discuss that.  It seems pretty clear to me that we're not going back to
the old format.



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tony Shelver
Date:
Subject: Re: New "function tables" in V13 documentation
Next
From: Peter Coppens
Date:
Subject: Execution plan does not use index