Re: Online checksums verification in the backend - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Online checksums verification in the backend
Date
Msg-id 20201102072937.GC15770@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Online checksums verification in the backend  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Nov 01, 2020 at 05:50:06PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2020-11-02 10:45:00 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On 2020-11-02 10:05:25 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > > There is no place doing that on HEAD.
> > >
> > > Err?
> > > How is this not doing IO while holding a buffer mapping lock?
> >
> > Well, other than the one we are discussing of course :)
>
> I am not following? Were you just confirming that its not a thing we do?

I meant that this is not done in any place other than the one
introduced by c780a7a.  So we have one place where it happens, and
no places before c780a7a.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel copy
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Reduce the number of special cases to build contrib modules on windows