Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress
Date
Msg-id 20201016010032.GB1581@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress  (Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 01:06:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Other than src/test/modules/brin, the ISOLATION users don't look
> much like real extensions (rather than test scaffolding), either.
> If you discount test scaffolding modules then the use-counts are
> more like 4 to 1.

Out of core, the only thing I can see with isolation tests is rum, but
it uses a workaround to have an access to the necessary binaries.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Online checksums verification in the backend
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Is the doc for SHOW somewhat stale?