Re: Probably typo in multixact.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Probably typo in multixact.c
Date
Msg-id 20201008012639.GA3457@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Probably typo in multixact.c  ("Hou, Zhijie" <houzj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>)
Responses Re: Probably typo in multixact.c
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 01:15:35AM +0000, Hou, Zhijie wrote:
> Hi
>
> In multixact.c I found some comments like the following:
>
> *        Similar to AtEOX_MultiXact but for COMMIT PREPARED
> * Discard the local MultiXactId cache like in AtEOX_MultiXact
>
> Since there's no function called "AtEOX_MultiXact" in the code,
> I think the "AtEOX_MultiXact" may be a typo.
>
> AtEOXact_MultiXact seems to be the right function here.

Yes, that looks like a simple typo to me as well.
AtEOXact_MultiXact() shares portions of the logics in
PostPrepare_MultiXact and multixact_twophase_postcommit.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hou, Zhijie"
Date:
Subject: Probably typo in multixact.c
Next
From: Andy Fan
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Keeps tracking the uniqueness with UniqueKey