Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch
Date
Msg-id 20200930071543.GL1996@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 02:53:27PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> As far as I can see, patches 0001 and 0002 have been already applied,
> but not 0003.  Could you send a rebase to allow the CF bot to run, at
> least?

This was two weeks ago.  Looking at 0003, the thing is not really
complicated, but as this thread has stalled I have marked the entry as
RwF.
--
Michael
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove useless distinct clauses
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Add timeline to partial WAL segments