Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?
Date
Msg-id 20200917075101.GZ2873@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?  (Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>)
Responses Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 04:27:53PM -0700, Paul A Jungwirth wrote:
> Here is a patch rebasing on master (meant to be applied on top of my
> other multirange patch) and newly including UPDATE/DELETE FOR PORTION
> OF. FOR PORTION OF works on any table with a temporal primary key. It
> restricts the UPDATE/DELETE to the given time frame, and then if the
> affected row(s) had any "leftovers" above or below the targeted range,
> it INSERTs new rows to preserve the untouched intervals.

This patch had no reviews, unfortunately it cannot be applied
cleanly.  Could you send a rebase please?
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Next
From: yuzuko
Date:
Subject: Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table (autoanalyze)