Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance
Date
Msg-id 20200917.094245.433560970731138050.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I have nothing, I'm just reading starter papers and trying to learn a
> bit more about the concepts at this stage.  I was thinking of
> reviewing some of the more mechanical parts of the patch set, though,
> like perhaps the transition table lifetime management, since I have
> worked on that area before.

Do you have comments on this part?

I am asking because these patch sets are now getting closer to
committable state in my opinion, and if there's someting wrong, it
should be fixed soon so that these patches are getting into the master
branch.

I think this feature has been long awaited by users and merging the
patches should be a benefit for them.

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pgindent vs dtrace on macos
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore causing deadlocks on partitioned tables