Re: Missing "Up" navigation link between parts and doc root? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Missing "Up" navigation link between parts and doc root?
Date
Msg-id 20200908191053.GB3297@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Missing "Up" navigation link between parts and doc root?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Missing "Up" navigation link between parts and doc root?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Sep  6, 2020 at 04:59:11PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2020-08-25 21:48, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul  4, 2020 at 08:47:53AM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hello Peter,
> > > 
> > > > The original stylesheets explicitly go out of their way to do it that
> > > > way. We can easily fix that by removing that special case.  See attached
> > > > patch.
> > > > 
> > > > That patch only fixes it for the header.  To fix it for the footer as
> > > > well, we'd first need to import the navfooter template to be able to
> > > > customize it.
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the patch, which applies cleanly, doc compiles, works for me with
> > > w3m.
> > > 
> > > > Not a big problem though.
> > > 
> > > Nope, just mildly irritating for quite a long time:-) So I'd go for back
> > > patching if it applies cleanly.
> > 
> > Can we get Peter's patch for this applied soon?  Thanks.  Should I apply
> > it?
> 
> I have made the analogous changes to the footer as well and committed this.

I see this only applied to master.  Shouldn't this be backpatched?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Yet another fast GiST build
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: INSERT ON CONFLICT and RETURNING