Re: Missing "Up" navigation link between parts and doc root? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Missing "Up" navigation link between parts and doc root?
Date
Msg-id 20200825194851.GG26852@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Missing "Up" navigation link between parts and doc root?  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Responses Re: Missing "Up" navigation link between parts and doc root?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jul  4, 2020 at 08:47:53AM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> 
> Hello Peter,
> 
> > The original stylesheets explicitly go out of their way to do it that
> > way. We can easily fix that by removing that special case.  See attached
> > patch.
> > 
> > That patch only fixes it for the header.  To fix it for the footer as
> > well, we'd first need to import the navfooter template to be able to
> > customize it.
> 
> Thanks for the patch, which applies cleanly, doc compiles, works for me with
> w3m.
> 
> > Not a big problem though.
> 
> Nope, just mildly irritating for quite a long time:-) So I'd go for back
> patching if it applies cleanly.

Can we get Peter's patch for this applied soon?  Thanks.  Should I apply
it?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: LWLockAcquire and LockBuffer mode argument
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix Uninitialized scalar variable (UNINIT) (src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c)