At Mon, 24 Aug 2020 21:49:40 -0400, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote in
> > > Are you saying we should _require_ clientcert=verify-full when 'cert'
> > > authentication is used? I don't see the point of that --- I just
> > > updated the docs to say doing so was duplicate behavior.
> >
> > I don't suggest changing the current behavior. I'm saying it is the
> > way it is working and we should correctly error-out that since it
> > doesn't work as specified.
Sorry, I mistead you. I don't suggest verify-full is needed for cert
authentication. I said we should just reject the combination
cert+veriry-ca.
> Uh, I don't understand what 'combination the same way with
> "cert"+"no-verify"'. Right now, cert with no clientcert/verify line
> works just fine. Is "no-verify" something special? Are you saying it
> is any random string that would generate an error?
It was delimited as "We should reject (that)" "that combination
(=cert+ferify-ca)" "the same way(=error-out)" "with cert+no-verify".
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
