On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:38:38AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:24 AM Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> Not necessarily. It's likely that not all indexes use ICU collations, and
> you still save time loading what may be large amounts of data.
>
> I agree though, that it *could* be slow.
>
> I agree it definitely could, but I'm not sure I see any case where it would
> actually be slower than the alternative (which would be dump/reload).
Well, given that pg_upgrade is more complex to run than pg_dump/reload,
you then have to weigh the complexity of using pg_upgrade with index
rebuild vs. the simpler pg_dump. Right now, you know pg_upgrade in link
mode is going to be fast, but with the reindex, you have a much more
complex decision to make.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
