Hi,
On 2020-08-16 16:17:23 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > It seems entirely likely that there's a timing component in this, for
> > instance autovacuum coming along at just the right time.
>
> D'oh. The attached seems to make it 100% reproducible.
Great! It interestingly didn't work as the first item on the schedule,
where I had duplicated it it to out of impatience. I guess there might
be some need of concurrent autovacuum activity or something like that.
I now luckily have a rr trace of the problem, so I hope I can narrow it
down to the original problem fairly quickly.
Thanks,
Andres
