Re: Dependencies for partitioned indexes are still a mess - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Dependencies for partitioned indexes are still a mess
Date
Msg-id 20200814213534.GA8949@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Dependencies for partitioned indexes are still a mess  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2020-Aug-14, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> On 2020-Aug-12, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> 
> > Hmm, we do make the FK constraint depend on the ATTACH for the direct
> > children; what I think we're lacking is dependencies on descendants
> > twice-removed (?) or higher.  This mock patch seems to fix this problem
> > by adding dependencies recursively on all children of the index; I no
> > longer see this problem with it.
> 
> After going over this some more, this analysis seems correct.  Here's a
> better version of the patch which seems final to me.

Pushed.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: fixing old_snapshot_threshold's time->xid mapping