On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:15:44PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 11:13 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 10:00 AM Peter Eisentraut
> > <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > > In order not to derail this patch set I think it would be okay for now
> > > to just include all index AMs in dependency tracking and invent a
> > > mechanism later that excludes hash and bloom in an extensible manner.
> >
> > FTR I'll be happy to take care of that.
>
> Ok, thanks! Let's go with that.
Thanks!
Here's a rebased v27 that removes the current approach to ignore indexes that
don't rely on a stable ordering. I'll start a new thread on that matter once
the infrastructure pieces will be committed.
