Re: 12.3 replicas falling over during WAL redo - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: 12.3 replicas falling over during WAL redo
Date
Msg-id 20200803213454.GA32739@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 12.3 replicas falling over during WAL redo  (Ben Chobot <bench@silentmedia.com>)
Responses Re: 12.3 replicas falling over during WAL redo  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Re: 12.3 replicas falling over during WAL redo  (Ben Chobot <bench@silentmedia.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 2020-Aug-03, Ben Chobot wrote:

> Alvaro Herrera wrote on 8/3/20 12:34 PM:
> > On 2020-Aug-03, Ben Chobot wrote:
> > 
> > Yep. Looking at the ones in block 6501,
> > 
> > > rmgr: Btree       len (rec/tot):     72/    72, tx:   76393394, lsn:
> > > A0A/AB2C43D0, prev A0A/AB2C4378, desc: INSERT_LEAF off 41, blkref #0: rel
> > > 16605/16613/60529051 blk 6501
> > > rmgr: Btree       len (rec/tot):     72/    72, tx:   76396065, lsn:
> > > A0A/AC4204A0, prev A0A/AC420450, desc: INSERT_LEAF off 48, blkref #0: rel
> > > 16605/16613/60529051 blk 6501
> > My question was whether the block has received the update that added the
> > item in offset 41; that is, is the LSN in the crashed copy of the page
> > equal to A0A/AB2C43D0?  If it's an older value, then the write above was
> > lost for some reason.
> 
> How do I tell?

You can use pageinspect's page_header() function to obtain the page's
LSN.  You can use dd to obtain the page from the file,

dd if=16605/16613/60529051 bs=8192 count=1 seek=6501 of=/tmp/page.6501 

then put that binary file in a bytea column, perhaps like

create table page (raw bytea);
insert into page select pg_read_binary_file('/tmp/page');

and with that you can run page_header:

create extension pageinspect;
select h.* from page, page_header(raw) h;

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ben Chobot
Date:
Subject: Re: 12.3 replicas falling over during WAL redo
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: 12.3 replicas falling over during WAL redo