Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
Subject Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge
Date
Msg-id 20200723122909.2062a4d9@firost
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge
List pgsql-bugs
On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 15:44:16 +0530
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 9:05 PM Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
> <jgdr@dalibo.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 15:29:00 +0530
> > Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >  
> > > BTW, can you please test if the problem exist in back-branches, and does
> > > your change fix it there as well?  
> >
> > Gather Merge appears in v10, but I haven't been able to produce a plan
> > using it. 
> 
> I am able to do it for v10.  I think you can try by "set
> enable_hashagg = off;" and following all other steps mentioned in your
> email? 

Indeed. I confirm it produces the same result. I've been able to successfully
test to proposed fix.

> Attached, please find the patch for v10 with a modified commit
> message.  I will do it for other versions as well if you are fine with
> it?

I'm not an english-native writer, but I would rephrase this:

  We can do a similar thing for Gather Merge as well but it seems the better
  to account for stats during nodes shutdown after completing the execution.

Thanks!

Regards,



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge