Re: Multi-byte character case-folding - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Multi-byte character case-folding
Date
Msg-id 20200714200811.GA17494@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Multi-byte character case-folding  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul  6, 2020 at 08:32:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yes, a GUC changing this would be a headache.  It would be just as much of
> a compatibility and security hazard as standard_conforming_strings (which
> indeed I've been thinking of proposing that we get rid of; it's hung
> around long enough).

+1

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: recovering from "found xmin ... from before relfrozenxid ..."
Next
From: Anastasia Lubennikova
Date:
Subject: Re: Rethinking opclass member checks and dependency strength