Re: expose parallel leader in CSV and log_line_prefix - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On 2020-Jul-10, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:45:29PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> > I think it's overly verbose; all non-parallel backends are going to get
> > their own PID twice, and I'm not sure this is going to be great to
> > parse.  I think it would be more sensible that if the process does not
> > have a parent (leader), %P expands to empty.
> 
> That's what's done.
> 
> +             <entry>Process ID of the parallel group leader if this process was
> +             at some point involved in parallel query, otherwise null.  For a
> +             parallel group leader itself, this field is set to its own process
> +             ID.</entry>

Oh, okay by me then.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services