Greetings,
* Praveen Kumar K S (praveenssit@gmail.com) wrote:
> But if you look at the output below, 00000001000000000000000D is already
> 16MB and new WAL are created. As per my understanding,
> 00000001000000000000000D should have been archived. Am I wrong here ?
Yes, you're wrong- WAL files are re-used and will always be 16MB even if
they aren't yet completed.
Thanks,
Stephen