Re: INDEX with optional storage parameter value - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: INDEX with optional storage parameter value
Date
Msg-id 20200630162823.GD28710@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: INDEX with optional storage parameter value  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-docs
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 09:53:17AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 04:18:58PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 05:14:23PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > I found a few more places that also didn't properly document this; 
> > > patch attached.
> > 
> > Good catch!  I am not seeing any missing spots, so this looks good to
> > me.  You are planning a backpatch, right?
> 
> Yes, backpatch.  I found the pattern of areas needing fixes to be quite
> odd.  ;-)

Patch applied through 9.5.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee




pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: INDEX with optional storage parameter value
Next
From: Pavel Borisov
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clarification of use logical operators inside phrase operator