On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 11:16:26AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Also, wolfSSL is developed by a company and dual GPL/commerical
> > licenses, so it seems like a mismatch to me.
>
> Yeah, that's definitely a factor behind my disinterest in
> making wolfSSL be the only alternative. However, as long as
> it's available on GPL terms, I don't see a problem with it
> being one alternative.
Yeah, I guess it depends on how much Postgres code it takes to support
it. Company-developed open source stuff usually goes into pay mode once
it gets popular, so I am not super-excited to be going in this
direction.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
