On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 01:09:39PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2020-06-22 10:35:47 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > I propose to backpatch b61d161c14 [1] (Introduce vacuum errcontext to
> > display additional information.).
...
> I think having the additional information in the back branches would be
> good. But on the other hand I think this is a somewhat large change
> to backpatch, and it hasn't yet much real world exposure.
I see that's nontrivial to cherry-pick due to parallel vacuum changes, and due
to re-arranging calls to pgstat_progress.
Since the next minor releases are in August, and PG13 expected to be released
~October, we could defer backpatching until November (or later).
> I'm also uncomfortable with the approach of just copying all of
> LVRelStats in several places:
>
> > /*
> > @@ -1580,9 +1648,15 @@ lazy_vacuum_page(Relation onerel, BlockNumber blkno, Buffer buffer,
> > int uncnt = 0;
> > TransactionId visibility_cutoff_xid;
> > bool all_frozen;
> > + LVRelStats olderrinfo;
I guess the alternative is to write like
LVRelStats olderrinfo = {
.phase = vacrelstats.phase,
.blkno = vacrelstats.blkno,
.indname = vacrelstats.indname,
};
--
Justin
