Re: Missing HashAgg EXPLAIN ANALYZE details for parallel plans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Missing HashAgg EXPLAIN ANALYZE details for parallel plans
Date
Msg-id 20200619191445.GA20665@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Missing HashAgg EXPLAIN ANALYZE details for parallel plans  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2020-Jun-19, David Rowley wrote:


> > +   size = offsetof(SharedAggInfo, sinstrument)
> > +       + pcxt->nworkers * sizeof(AggregateInstrumentation);
> >
> > => There's a couple places where I'd prefer to see "+" at the end of the
> > preceding line (but YMMV).
> 
> I pretty much just copied the whole of that code from nodeSort.c. I'm
> more inclined to just keep it as similar to that as possible. However,
> if pgindent decides otherwise, then I'll go with that. I imagine it
> won't move it though as that code has already been through indentation
> a few times before.

pgindent won't change your choice here.  This seems an ideological
issue; each committer has got their style.  Some people prefer to put
operators at the end of the line, others do it this way.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow to specify restart_lsn inpg_create_physical_replication_slot()
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Fast DSM segments