Re: Global snapshots - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From movead.li@highgo.ca
Subject Re: Global snapshots
Date
Msg-id 2020061917031834329360@highgo.ca
Whole thread Raw
In response to Global snapshots  (Stas Kelvich <s.kelvich@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: Global snapshots
List pgsql-hackers

>> would like to know if the patch related to CSN based snapshot [2] is a
>> precursor for this, if not, then is it any way related to this patch
>> because I see the latest reply on that thread [2] which says it is an
>> infrastructure of sharding feature but I don't understand completely
>> whether these patches are related?
>I need some time to study this patch.. At first sight it is different.

This patch[2] is almost base on [3], because I think [1] is talking about 2PC
and FDW, so this patch focus on CSN only and I detach the global snapshot
part and FDW part from the [1] patch. 

I notice CSN will not survival after a restart in [1] patch, I think it may not the
right way, may be it is what in last mail "Needs guarantees of monotonically
increasing of the CSN in the case of an instance restart/crash etc" so I try to
add wal support for CSN on this patch.

That's why this thread exist.


Regards,
Highgo Software (Canada/China/Pakistan)
URL : www.highgo.ca
EMAIL: mailto:movead(dot)li(at)highgo(dot)ca

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: update substring pattern matching syntax