Re: valgrind versus pg_atomic_init() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: valgrind versus pg_atomic_init()
Date
Msg-id 20200609032509.a76hlgvmxhs35gqy@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: valgrind versus pg_atomic_init()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: valgrind versus pg_atomic_init()
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2020-06-08 18:21:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Yea, it could just do that. It seemed slightly easier/clearer, back when
> > I wrote it, to just use pg_atomic_write* for the initialization, but
> > this seems enough of a reason to stop doing so. Will change it in all
> > branches, unless somebody sees a reason to not do so?
>
> Works for me.

And done.

- Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Intermittent test plan change in "privileges" test on BF animal prion
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Intermittent test plan change in "privileges" test on BF animal prion