On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 01:37:07PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I think this part remains unanswered: why are there *three* invalid
> indexes, and not two? It makes sense for the UNIQUE indexes to acquire
> invalid duplicates, but strangely we also have a
> act_re_procdef_deployment_id_idx_ccnew which is *not* unique. What
> happened there?
More than one REINDEX query at table-level failed I guess?
> (I also wonder if it wouldn't make more sense to reindexdb to attempt to
> drop indexes that it couldn't complete.)
(That's a good idea.)
--
Michael
