Re: minor doc fix - garbage in example of result of unnest - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: minor doc fix - garbage in example of result of unnest
Date
Msg-id 20200605153811.4m3pnun526ndf6dp@development
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: minor doc fix - garbage in example of result of unnest  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: minor doc fix - garbage in example of result of unnest
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 09:56:54AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
>> diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
>> index 7c06afd3ea..3b810c0eb4 100644
>> --- a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
>> +++ b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
>> @@ -17821,7 +17821,6 @@ SELECT NULLIF(value, '(none)') ...
>>   1
>>   2
>>  </programlisting>
>> -        (2 rows in result)
>>         </para></entry>
>>        </row>
>
>That's not "garbage", I put it there intentionally.
>

Why is it outside the <programlisting> though? Also, the next unnest
example does not include the number of rows - why the difference?


-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: minor doc fix - garbage in example of result of unnest