On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 07:49:45AM -0700, Jesse Zhang wrote:
> For bystanders: Andres and I argued for "fixing this sooner and
> backpatch" and Michael suggested "wait longer and whack all moles". We
> have waited, and there seems to be only one mole (finding all dead
> unbroken "include"s was left as an exercise for the reader). Have we
> come to an agreement on this?
If Andres could take care of this issue as he feels is suited, that's
OK for me. I could look at that and play with llvm builds. Now I am
not really familiar with it, so it would take me some time but we are
all here to learn :)
Please note that I would still wait for their next GA release to plug
in any extra holes at the same time. @Jesse: or is this change
actually part of the upcoming 10.0.1?
--
Michael
