Re: hash join error improvement (old) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: hash join error improvement (old)
Date
Msg-id 20200526135550.GA12961@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: hash join error improvement (old)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: hash join error improvement (old)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Tom, thanks for looking.

On 2020-May-25, Tom Lane wrote:

> I don't mind if you want to extend that paradigm to also use "wrote only
> %d bytes" wording, but the important point is to get the SQLSTATE set on
> the basis of ENOSPC rather than whatever random value errno will have
> otherwise.

Hmm, right -- I was extending the partial read case to apply to a
partial write, and we deal with those very differently.  I changed the
write case to use our standard approach.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: what can go in root.crt ?
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: Make the qual cost on index Filter slightly higher than qual coston index Cond.