Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs.address/IP-address/IP-mask fields - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Justin Pryzby
Subject Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs.address/IP-address/IP-mask fields
Date
Msg-id 20200526012647.GV4472@telsasoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-mask fields  (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs.address/IP-address/IP-mask fields  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 06:29:31PM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
> 1. Near the top, there's a line saying "A record can have one of the seven
> formats", then the followup list shows 9 formats.

Thanks for pointing it out;  it was also mentioned here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200505104507.GA32455%40gate.oper.dinoex.org
So I'd included it it in my "docs" patch to resend someday.

-- 
Justin



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #16460: Error when executing REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW WITHDATA;
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: logical replication: could not create file "state.tmp": Fileexists