On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:48:53AM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 02:47, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> Agreed. I don't think either that we need to update this comment. I
>> was playing with this patch and what you have here looks fine by me.
>> Two nits: the extra parenthesis in the assert are not necessary, and
>> the indentation had some diffs. Tom has just reindented the whole
>> tree, so let's keep things clean.
>
> LGTM.
Thanks for double-checking. Applied and back-patched down to 10
then.
--
Michael
