Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster.
Date
Msg-id 20200512202726.GA31125@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster.  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2020-May-12, Robert Haas wrote:

> That reminds me that it might be easier to maintain that table if we
> broke it up into one table per major category - that is, one table for
> lwlocks, one table for IPC, one table for IO, etc. - instead of a
> single table with a row-span number that is large and frequently
> updated incorrectly.

(Didn't we have a patch to generate the table programmatically?)

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: refactoring basebackup.c
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster.