Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Date
Msg-id 20200510122523.zdfceexcvdm6cml4@development
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 06:48:02PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 3:19 PM Tomas Vondra
><tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> I'm generally OK with most of this - I'd probably keep the single-line
>> format, but I don't feel very strongly about that and if others think
>> using two lines is better ...
>>
>> Barring objections I'll get this polished and pushed soon-ish (say,
>> early next week).
>
>I see something about starting a new thread on the Open Items page.
>Please CC me on this.
>
>Speaking in my capacity as an RMT member: Glad to see that you plan to
>close this item out next week. (I had planned on giving you a nudge
>about this, but it looks like I don't really have to now.)
>

Not sure about about the new thread - the discussion continues on the
main incremental sort thread, I don't see any proposal to start a new
thread there. IMO it'd be pointless at this point.


regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: otar shavadze
Date:
Subject: Cast json array to postgres array and preserve order of elements
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: valgrind error