Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs.address/IP-address/IP-mask fields - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs.address/IP-address/IP-mask fields
Date
Msg-id 20200428174557.GA7095@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs.address/IP-address/IP-mask fields  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs.address/IP-address/IP-mask fields
List pgsql-bugs
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:14:06PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2020-04-21 21:08, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >     <para>
> > -   A record can have one of the seven formats
> > +   A record can have one of the 11 formats
> 
> I think this sort of thing is a sign that the number should be replaced by
> "several".

Agreed:

-   A record can have one of the 11 formats
+   A record can have several formats:

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #16395: error when selecting generated column in a foreigntable
Next
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #16399: Ldap authentication bug