Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error
Date
Msg-id 20200409072013.GS1606@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 12:33:57PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> We can add more tests to validate the syntax, but my worry was to not
> increase test timing by doing (parallel) vacuum.  So maybe we can do
> such syntax validation on empty tables or you have any better idea?

Using empty tables for positive tests is the least expensive option.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: adding partitioned tables to publications
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: adding partitioned tables to publications