On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 05:17:36PM +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> I'm not sure who would need this information before the WAL machinery is up,
> but is it safe enough in your opinion for futur usage of GetRecoveryState()? Do
> you think this information might be useful before the WAL machinery is set?
> Current "user" (eg. restoreTwoPhaseData()) only need to know if we are in
> recovery, whatever the reason.
(I had this thread marked as something to look at, but could not.
Sorry for the delay).
> src/test/recovery/t/011_crash_recovery.pl | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/test/recovery/t/011_crash_recovery.pl b/src/test/recovery/t/011_crash_recovery.pl
> index ca6e92b50d..ce2e899891 100644
> --- a/src/test/recovery/t/011_crash_recovery.pl
> +++ b/src/test/recovery/t/011_crash_recovery.pl
> @@ -15,11 +15,17 @@ if ($Config{osname} eq 'MSWin32')
May I ask why this new test is added to 011_crash_recovery.pl which is
aimed at testing crash and redo, while we have 002_archiving.pl that
is dedicated to archiving in a more general manner?
--
Michael
