Re: BUG #16334: We recently upgraded PG version from 9.5 to 10.10and system performance is not so good - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Julien Rouhaud
Subject Re: BUG #16334: We recently upgraded PG version from 9.5 to 10.10and system performance is not so good
Date
Msg-id 20200404070638.ytfi2lwaxd5sr662@nol
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #16334: We recently upgraded PG version from 9.5 to 10.10and system performance is not so good  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Once again, please don't top post.

On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 11:57:02AM +0530, Tejaswini GC wrote:
> Hello Julien,
> 
> The procedure for doing the upgrade is different for AWS.
> 


And is it possible to know what the procedure was?


> 
> After the PG upgrade we can see many locks in our system we believe this is
> the main reason for the issue we are facing,
> I can see these locks when using pg_stat_activity.
> 


Any more details?  Are you talking of heavyweight locks or lightweight locks?
Since version 9.6 both are visible in pg_stat_activity.


> Along with that few queries which were executing within millisecond are
> taking more than few hours.
> 


Please follow https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Slow_Query_Questions to provide
more details.



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tejaswini GC
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #16334: We recently upgraded PG version from 9.5 to 10.10 andsystem performance is not so good
Next
From: Arya F
Date:
Subject: Postgresql 12, 512 partition by hash. Slow select