Re: error context for vacuum to include block number - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: error context for vacuum to include block number
Date
Msg-id 20200327004121.GA20729@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: error context for vacuum to include block number  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2020-Mar-26, Justin Pryzby wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 07:49:51PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> > BTW I'm pretty sure this "revert back" phrasing is not good English --
> > you should just use "revert".  Maybe get some native speaker's opinion
> > on it.
> 
> I'm a native speaker; "revert back" might be called redundant but I think it's
> common usage.

Oh, okay.

> > And speaking of language, I find the particle "cbarg" rather very ugly,
> 
> I renamed it since it was kind of opaque looking.  It's in all the same places,
> so equally infectious; but I hope you like it better.

I like it much better, thanks :-)

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: SLRU statistics
Next
From: Kartyshov Ivan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed