Hello.
At Mon, 23 Mar 2020 18:38:53 -0400, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote in
> Patch applied to master, thanks.
The patch (8e8a0becb3) named archiver process as just "archiver". On
the other hand the discussion in the thread [1] was going to name the
process as "WAL/wal archiver". As all other processes related to WAL
are named as walreceiver, walsender, walwriter, wouldn't we name the
process like "wal archiver"?
[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200319195410.icib45bbgjwqb5zn@alap3.anarazel.de
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
