Hi,
On 2020-03-26 10:12:39 +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 23:19 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> I am reluctant to introduce new semantics like a reloption value of -2
> to disable a feature in this patch right before feature freeze.
>
> I believe there are enough options to disable insert-only vacuuming for
> an individual table:
> - Set the threshold to 2147483647. True, that will not work for very
> large tables, but I think that there are few tables that insert that
> many rows before they hit autovacuum_freeze_max_age anyway.
>
> - Set the scale factor to some astronomical value.
Meh. You *are* adding new semantics with these. And they're terrible.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
